Physiological cardiac pacing: Current status
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Current status of cardiac rehabilitation.
Cardiac rehabilitation is increasingly recognized as an integral component of the continuum of care for patients with cardiovascular disease. Its application is a class I recommendation in most contemporary cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines. Despite the documentation of substantial morbidity and mortality benefits, cardiac rehabilitation services are vastly underutilized. The core com...
متن کاملCardiac resynchronization therapy – current status and perspectives
Contact address: Sipoş Sergiu, MD Department of Cardiology, Emergency Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases “Prof. Dr. C.C. Iliescu”, Sos. Fundeni no. 258, 022328 Bucharest, Romania. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION It’s been over 50 years since the fi rst pacemakers were invented. Since then, important changes have been introduced concerning bradycardias, but also anti-tachycardia therapi...
متن کاملThe current status of cardiac surgery.
the current status of cardiac surgery What to say and what to do when mostly your friends love reading? Are you the one that don't have such hobby? So, it's important for you to start having that hobby. You know, reading is not the force. We're sure that reading will lead you to join in better concept of life. Reading will be a positive activity to do every time. And do you know our friends bec...
متن کاملPhysiological pacing: a moving target?
During the 1990s and the early years of the 2000s, there was considerable debate on the advantages of ‘physiological’ pacing, which at that time denoted dual-chamber vs. single-chamber pacing. A series of landmark studies, including the MOST, PASE, CTOPP, and UKPACE trials, randomized patients with various indications for pacing into DDD vs. VVI pacing modes. Despite high hopes and great belief...
متن کاملCanadian Trial of Physiological Pacing: Effects of physiological pacing during long-term follow-up.
BACKGROUND The Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing (CTOPP) reported that the risk of stroke or cardiovascular death was similar between patients receiving ventricular versus physiological pacemakers at the end of the original follow-up period of 3 years. However, the occurrence of atrial fibrillation was significantly less frequent with physiological pacemakers. To assess a potential delayed...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Indian Heart Journal
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0019-4832
DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.03.033